An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
Blog Article
Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Additionally it is important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual duration of service almost violates your entire service construction as being a civil servant inducted in Quality 17 by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher grade, which is neither the intention of the legislation nor in the equity. Read more
Since the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Evidently distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion includes a go to the higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, to the other hand, offers financial relief by placing an employee in the higher spend scale, without transforming their occupation duties or position. It is a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained while in the same spend scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they absence prospects for promotion. Upgradation is really a policy Resource used to ease the hardship of prolonged-term stagnation. Read more
As the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Regulation professors traditionally have played a much lesser role in developing case regulation in common law than professors in civil legislation. Because court decisions in civil regulation traditions are historically brief[4] and never formally amenable to establishing precedent, much on the exposition on the regulation in civil legislation traditions is done by lecturers instead than by judges; this is called doctrine and may be published in treatises or in journals including Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common law courts relied tiny on legal scholarship; So, in the turn of your twentieth century, it was very scarce to discover an instructional writer quoted in a very legal decision (other than Maybe for that educational writings of notable judges like Coke and Blackstone).
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it is unclear the way it applies to any specified situation, usually rendering judgments based on the intent of lawmakers and the circumstances of your case click here at hand. These decisions become a guide for long term similar cases.
In some jurisdictions, case regulation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
Have you been looking for Court Information? You can use our site to search for just a case or search to get a person. Information over the site is updated every 24 several hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found on the search site is provided to be used as reference material and isn't the official court record.
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The law enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair on the offender and also the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Any court might find to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.
Because the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been reached, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Criminal cases Inside the common legislation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to the case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Compared with most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.